「日刊四字」へようこそ!

Now Featuring 1級 Grammar, Everyday Japanese That You Won't Find in the Book, and Language and Cultural Trivia!

Monday, April 21, 2008

Speaking Japanese as a Non-Native


Jeff's entry the other day about the difficulties in speaking Japanese as a non-native touched on a lot of issues that, I think, most people eventually hit in their studies of Japanese, probably more than any other language. Why? Regardless of whether you agree with them or not, it seems the vast majority of people raised in Japan believe that there is something biological about the cultural aspect of Japanese language that renders it incomprehensible to non-natives.

Personally, I don't want to get into a long discussion about culture and cultural differences (which I think are vastly overplayed, although certainly not something you can easily discount). What I do want to go into is why I think it's a travesty that so many people fall into, and at times end up perpetuating, the myth that the cultural differences facing us NN's (non-natives) are insurmountable.

Plus I like to 1) show off how much I know and 2) use the fact that it was my birthday to force Jeff into letting me write a guest post.

Let's start by considering the example sentence that Jeff gave us, which a Japanese person informed him was "grammatically correct, but not what a Japanese person would say." I don't know exactly what the person said in Japanese, but I imagine something along the lines of "文法は間違っていないけど日本人はそんなことを言わない。" (or, since he lives in Saga, 文法のおうとっとばってんが、日本人そぎゃんこついわんたい!)

Actually, regardless of how much Japanese girls may go crazy over it, Jeff's bunpo was incorrect here. Since we're all nerds to some extent here, I'm going to pull those proof-reading terms from 7th grade (your grade-age may vary). This is what we would call, in English, a diction error. The specific Japanese term for diction is 語彙 goi. Considering how people almost never consider a diction error the same thing as a grammar error in Japanese, I almost said that the two are completely discrete concepts in our 2nd (or 3rd or 4th) language of choice; on second thought, thinking of the unenviable grammatical skill of the average native speaker of any language lacking other linguistic qualifications, I'm going to withhold judgment. Nevertheless, Jeff's example sentence was not in the truest sense correct, and this is another example of native speakers not always knowing their language as well as one might assume. Confusion between sentences with correct grammar that simply aren't said in Japanese and those whose grammar, or specifically their diction, are incorrect is far too common, and its much easier to write all of this confusion off as "文化の違い" than to really think about it. (Just like the landlord who is afraid of his tenants cooking with oil, or the gaijin who claims "I used perfect Japanese and the guy pretended not to understand me!") That's because this excuse allows you to not really think about why a given sentence is incorrect (just like the landlord might realize, after a little thought, that Japan is, after all, the land of foods like katsu, kara-age, and tenpura, and like the gaijin might realize that, well, he talks like a gaijin and no one can understand wtf he's saying).

Fine, you say, but that's just one example sentence. We've all had multiple experiences with the "Nihonjin ha sonna koto iwanai," and I don't mean to discount them all, just most of them, which are purely questions of diction.

Whats a legitimate "sonna koto iwanai?" Let's consider Jeff's other example about (and I can just see this happening) someone who's prejudiced and poorly thought out comments are reflective of their lack of brains. I think this is the perfect example for me to explain how I feel on the subject.

There is nothing about this sentence that renders it unspeakable in all cases in Japanese society. There are just two ways to arrive at it.

The first is the direct route. My translation of Jeff's sentence (with some allowances for 流れ): あなたの言ってることは間違ってると思う。あなたのその間違った考え方は、あなた自身の愚かさか、故意的な無知さを示している。

Do most people say this exact thing, in these exact words? No, certainly not. There is the obvious problem of having to change politeness levels and certain usages depending on your age and social station. More importantly, you can be pretty sure that whoever you say this to won't be happy about it, so you'd have to be quite prepared to 縁を切る(en wo kiru) with, or rather 縁を切られる (en wo kirareru) by this person, but isn't that true of saying the same thing in English? Aren't you actually better off in Japan, because, let's face it, you're more likely to get punched in the balls for your rudeness in the US than you are in Japan (my apologies to any non-US English speakers who may be reading this, but your ways are far more difficult for me to comprehend than those of Japanese people. I mean seriously, guys, 'flavour'? Would you like some balswet with your Francified spelling?)

Now consider the second way to the same meaning. This involves changing the words, obviously, to the point where you can't directly reverse translate to get the same English anymore. I don't have a problem with this and don't see why this necessarily has to mean that we are talking about a completely different sentence. Yes, you have to make an allowance for the more 縦 tate nature of Japanese society (and this is where I will make a concession when it comes to "bunka no chigai"), but a Japanese literate listener who allows that you have a certain amount of literacy will understand your meaning, and the disdain behind it.

Aye, there's the rub. As a foreign speaker of Japanese, you're going to have a hard time being ascribed fluency in Japanese. The same person who asks me to teach their children kanji will turn around and wonder at the fact that I can read the characters for 'ichi,' 'ni,' and 'san.' But kanji, and Japanese in total, are by no means easy, and certainly not as easy our bravado sometimes may make them out to be. So I don't doubt the intentions of the Japanese person who assumes that I can't speak Japanese (yes, I'm only human, and in real life I get as angry or more so when brushed off for my gaijin-ness). I do, though, think that the illiteracy assigned to us as foreign-born speakers is the biggest bunka no chigai that keeps our Japanese from being as effective if not as correct as we may want it to be.

But how many of us really have that language literacy on a consistent level? I'd wager not that many. So let's not get ahead of ourselves, because we all still make "diction" mistakes, sometimes even at Saga Jinja.

PS Jeff, since I've given you so much crap on this post, here's a gift. 勃起気味. It works.

Jinja jinja~, jinja jinja jinja~

5 comments:

AzzidisRidden said...

Dockside,

Thank you for the article which is highly informative and in no way alienates our imaginary (ie anyone who is not the three of us) readership with a slew of inside jokes.


However, I have two unresolved issues:

1: Why is that かぎりsnoring sentence incorrect?
2: What makes a "diction" error different than... just saying something in a way that's never been said before? Don't get me wrong, I hate it when someone says "The movie encapsulates" to mean "The movie is about" but this issue speaks to my main point in general.

What frustrates me more than not being taken seriously by native speakers, are some of the limits that I feel the culture of "what is and is not acceptable to say/talk about" places on me.

I had a long frustrating conversation with a woman who wanted me to explain why the following joke was funny:

"Why is the cemetery the most popular place in town?"
"Because people are dying to get in."

I explained it to her, the dual meanings of "dying to," but she already knew that. She just couldn't imagine how a joke about dying and cemeteries could be funny, and wanted me to change it's essence (just as you suggested changing the essence of my response to a fictional drunken man) so that it worked in Japanese terms. That's impossible.

I don't harbor any illusions about being so proficient in Japanese that I think I can speak with authority about what Japanese people can and can't say with the tools their language provides.

Maybe if I was a native speaker, I wouldn't have problems expressing what I wanted to, in the exact terms that I wanted to... but then, if I was a native speaker, I wouldn't necessarily want to express the same things as non-native me. And that was kind of my point.

Nirav said...

Yeah, so maybe it was a little bit gratuitous, but I saw that picture of the goat and there was no turning back.

To answer your unresolved issues:

1) It seems to me your understanding of the term かぎり is based on its usage in "as long as..." This is fine when you mean it as a condition for something (i.e. as long as I am around I won't let anyone eat this cake - 私がいる限りこのケーキは誰にも食べさせない); the problem is that you are using it as a qualifier, to delineate a certain amount of time. This is a separate usage in Japanese and does not fit into the functions of the 限り pattern. Think of it kind of like this: させる means both to let do and to make do, but Japanese uses the same word for both. "As long as" in English can be used both in conditional statements or in descriptive statements, but in Japanese one must distinguish between the two uses more explicitly. I hope that answers your question.

2) You are right in that "diction" is just another arbitrary rule (like pants) that is probably destined to give way to the inexorable forces of language change. At the same time, however, though we may one day be speaking lolcat as the "legitimate" form of English, the fact remains that the usage is not widely understood amount people literate in the language, and therefore I think should be counted as an error, especially by someone still in the process of learning.

I understand what you are saying about changing the essence of what you are saying and agree that things don't necessarily mesh between the two languages. I even agree that changing the essence of the cemetary joke makes the whole thing pointless, and its probably a joke better left untranslated. This is one reason why it's hard to be funny on more than a slapstick level in Japanese.

But I think that the other example of telling off a middle aged man is slightly more complicated. I agree that a much smaller percentage of native Japanese speakers would be so up front to someone that they just met at, say, a yakitori place than would the corresponding segment of speakers of American English. Most native Japanese speakers, and I'm going to wager a good portion of the native English speakers, would be mortified to say something as aggressive and straightforwardly dismissive of a person; but I think that if you said what you meant to said, directly, in a cleaned up version of my translation, the point would get across in the intended fashion. The people around you would probably think "wow Americans are so straightforward/honest/scary/rude/selfish/assertive/hairy (wait...), but the listener would definitely understand you.

I guess my post was more in response to a generalized complaint that I get a lot more than to what you were saying. I really feel like a lot of the generalizations that you hear about Japanese (its vague, ambiguous, more closely attuned to the seasons, etc) come more from a lack of understanding/experience with the language itself than anything else. Sorry to have been unclear. And 勃起気味.

Who am I kidding? Theres nothing 気味 about it.

Claytonian said...

I think chavs would punch you in the balls for pointing out their willful ignorance too :o)

By the way, do you think a Japanese person would ever say 語彙が違います? Also, do you consider the following synonyms applicable if a really on their game J person was correcting us?:句法,措辞,語法

I ask because it's the first time I've encountered 語彙 in the diction sense, or much of any but the vocabulary sense (I'm going to suggest an amendment to wwwjdic though), not that I see it all that often anyways...

Claytonian said...

Actually the more I looked into it, the more I realized I could not suggest diction as a meaning for 語彙 on that submission form. I would say that 語彙 is part of the wider thing that is diction. If your diction is good, then your vocabulary is no doubt good as well.
So, what I'm saying is, I have no idea if 語彙 would come up if someone was correcting your "grammatical yet odd" Japanese, but at the least Nirav sent me on a good word hunt.

Muliya said...

Great work.